Liam Broady vs Mikail Alimli Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 16 Oct at 06:09 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Broady vs M. Alimli

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Broady 1 - 0 Alimli
They have played 2 sets in total, with Liam Broady winning 2 and Mikail Alimli winning 0. The last match between Liam Broady and Mikail Alimli was at the M15 Villers-les-Nancy, 16-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Liam Broady getting the victory 6-1 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Broady | 1 |
| Alimli | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Villers-les-Nancy(10-16-25)
L. Broady vs M. Alimli H2H Profile
L. Broady vs M. Alimli Match Preview:
- Recent second serve point statistics show that Mikail Alimli has a slight edge with 42.44% compared to Liam Broady's 42.00%.
- In return games, Alimli again has an advantage, winning 42.59% of opponent's second serve points, as opposed to Broady's 40.35%.
- However, Broady excels in first serve returns, capturing 25.75% compared to Alimli's 23.90%.
- When under pressure, Broady outperforms, saving 48.32% of breakpoints, while Alimli manages 43.48%.
- Broady dominates in overall match wins over the last year, with a 73.97% success rate, far surpassing Alimli’s 41.67%.
- Both players have their best career surface win percentages on Hard and Indoor Hard surfaces (63%), but differ significantly on others.
- Broady is more successful in Futures/ITF $10K events, winning 77.27% of his matches, whereas Alimli's success is 42.86%.
- Considering opponent quality, Alimli has faced tougher competitors, with an average opponent rank of 213.83 compared to Broady's 397.68.
- Broady also has a slightly better record in deciding sets, winning 58% over the last year compared to Alimli’s 50%.
Editorial Prediction (October 16, 2025, UTC):
The comparative analysis of their recent performances shows a competitive but distinct advantage for Liam Broady in several areas. Despite Mikail Alimli’s slight edges in second serve performance and return games, Broady’s superior ability to handle pressure and overall match success rate suggests a strong competitive edge.
Broady also demonstrates greater proficiency in first serve returns and excels in saving breakpoints, both of which are critical when the match intensity rises. His impressive record on Hard courts and solid performance in futures tournaments further bolster his prospects.
Though Alimli has faced more challenging opponents recently, Broady's consistent performance and higher success rate in deciding sets could be decisive. Taking all factors into account, Liam Broady is poised as the likely winner of the upcoming match.
Liam Broady vs Mikail Alimli Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Broady vs M. Alimli H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 6 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:21:3 | Average Match Time | 1:21:3 |
| 68% (36/53) | 1st Serve % | 57% (32/56) |
| 86% (31/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (22/32) |
| 47% (8/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (9/24) |
| 80% (4/5) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (1/2) |
| 45% (25/56) | Return Points Win % | 26% (14/53) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Broady Recent Matches Played
M. Alimli Recent Matches Played

L. Broady vs M. Alimli Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.59% (532/376) | YTD Win/Loss | 46.70% (92/105) |
| 57.06% (1196/900) | Sets Win/Loss | 46.47% (204/235) |
| 53.00% (10445/9264) | Games Win/Loss | 48.92% (2046/2136) |
| 63.23% (282/164) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.79% (32/31) |
| 54.93% (78/64) | Clay Win/Loss | 41.86% (36/50) |
| 60.70% (139/90) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (24/24) |
| 36.26% (33/58) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 2466 | Aces Total | 458 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 1577 | Total Double Faults | 335 |
| 1:14:18 | Average Match Time | 1:1:53 |
| 516.4 | Average Opponent Rank | 262.27 |
| 63% (30245/48103) | 1st Serve % | 55% (4383/8035) |
| 68% (20635/30245) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (2983/4383) |
| 52% (9331/17851) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (1741/3651) |
| 43% (2045/4746) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (301/720) |
| 40% (19039/47726) | Return Points Win % | 38% (2985/7816) |
| 47.27% (26/29) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56.25% (9/7) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45.98% (40/47) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55.72% (229/182) | Challenger W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 67.46% (226/109) | Futures W/L | 47.40% (91/101) |
| 59% (520/879) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 46% (89/193) |
| 35% (6/17) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (137/271) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (20/43) |
| 52% (141/269) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (26/49) |
| 87% (521/455) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (85/72) |
| 12% (521/65) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (85/13) |
| 20% (384/76) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (112/20) |